Uganda Christian University School of Law Law of Sales Course

Uganda Christian University School of Law Law of Sales Course

UGANDA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY, MUKONO CAMPUS

BACHELOR OF LAWS YEAR TWO

FACULTY OF LAW

LLB 2

Course title:            Law of Sales

Contact hours:        4 Lecture Hours and 2 Tutorial Hours per week

Credit units:            5

  1. Course description

 

The law of sales is an extension of the law of contract with roots in the over 900 year old mercantile custom and usage:  lex mercatoria (the law merchant). 

 

The law of sales is intended to introduce you to the fundamental knowledge and skills in the area of domestic sale of goods transactions. 

 

Trade in goods has been a central part of the social and economic fabric of Ugandan tribal societies since before our recorded history, and is perhaps the most common of all commercial transactions today.  However, with the advent of colonialism certain changes to the informal trade in goods led to the adoption of the Sale of Goods Act (1893) (UK) with necessary modification to suit local circumstances. 

 

The present course of study seeks to enlighten the student on the various provisions of the Uganda Sale of Goods Act (Cap. 82) and its application to daily commercial transactions involving the sale of goods.

 

  1. Course aim

This course is intended to develop knowledge of the legal principles that underlie the very simple and everyday act of buying and selling goods in a domestic perspective (Uganda).  It is also intended to develop skills in the construction of sale of goods contracts.   

 

  1. Course objectives

At the completion of the course, through interactive lectures, discussions, presentations, and research, the student should be able to:

 

  • Develop an understand the origins of Uganda’s law of sales;
  • Understand the fundamental principles of the law of sales;
  • Distinguish a sales transaction from other commercial transactions;
  • Identify the different participants in sales transactions, their obligations and potential legal liabilities;
  • Suggest remedies/ solutions to legal problems/ disputes that may arise in the course of sale of goods transactions;
  • Identify gaps in the law and suggest possible reforms in light of changing local circumstances and global trends in sale of goods practices.

 

  1. Methodology of Study:

Lecture sessions will be points of contact between the lecturer/tutor and the students. Students are expected to attend lectures, ask questions, discuss opinions and receive guidance for further study and research. 

 

Students are required to read and comprehend the recommended text and cases, and will be called upon to make presentations in class for discussion.

 

A reliance on ‘handouts’ (pre-compiled notes or photocopies) from the lecturer is discouraged since the very focus of legal education at this level is individual or group study with a view to contributing to discussion in class that will enable you to understand, and arrive at new and important realizations on the subject.

 

A good understanding of market trends in Uganda will also enable an excellent articulation of views in oral contributions in class, and the ability to incorporate that outlook into your coursework and examinations will attract high grades.

 

Guest speakers may be called in where possible to speak about particular issues under consideration.

Coursework assessment and examinations will be given according to the semester schedule. Coursework contributes 30% while the final exam contributes 70% to the final grade. You will receive instructions and assessment criteria prior to undertaking the coursework.

 

  1. E.

The students taking this course should have a good grasp of the law of contract, which is the foundation of all issues under consideration. 

 

Note: The student is advised to meticulously attend to his/her work at all stages of this course of study.  With that caution, diligence and industriousness will be rewarded, while incompetence will be treated with deserving contempt.

 

  1. F. Faith in Teaching

Where applicable we shall explore how, and to what extent Christianity informs aspects of the course unit.

 

  1. Course Materials

 

(i) Recommended Reading:

 

  • S Atiyah (2005), The Sale of Goods, 11th Edn, Pitman, London, UK/ (2000) 10th Edn.
  • I. Laibuta (2006), Principles of Commercial Law, Law Africa Publishing, Kenya.
  • Uganda Law Reform Commission: A study report on the reform of selected trade laws-sale of goods and supply of services law, ULRC Publication No. 28/2004
  • John Joseph Ogola (2005), Business Law, Focus Publishing Ltd, Kenya.
  • David Kelly, et al (2005) Business Law, 5th Edn, Cavendish Publishing Ltd, London.
  • Dennis Keenan (2003), Smith & Keenan’s Law for Business, 12th Edn, Pearson, Longman.
  • Keith Abbott et al, (2002) Business Law, 7th Edn, Thomson, UK.
  • Ewan Macintyre (1998), Cases & Materials: Commercial Law, Blackstone Press, London.
  • Paul Dobson (1997), Charlesworth’s Business Law, 16th, Thomson, Sweet & Maxwell, London.

 

(ii) Relevant Statutes:

  • Sale of Goods Act (Cap. 82) (all students must have this Act)
  • Contracts Act, 2010, Act No.6 of 2010

 

(iii) Bills:

  • The Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Bill
  • The Consumer Protection Bill

 

(iv) Other Relevant Links:

  • Uganda National Bureau of Standards Act, Cap 327, unbs.go.ug/
  • Uganda Consumer’s Protection Association (UCPA), ucpa.eac-quality.net
  • The East African Community Treaty, 1999 as amended in 2006 & 2007
  • The EAC Common Market Protocol and specifically the annexture on Free Movement of Goods (eac.int, for a free download of the protocol & annexture)

 

(v) Articles:

 Ben K. Twinomugisha: Protection of the Consumer in the Sale of Goods Act (Cap. 79), The Uganda Law Focus, December 2001, pg. 72

 

(vi) Websites  

  • Uganda Legal Information Institute, ulii.org (decisions of courts of Uganda)
  • British & Irish Legal Information Institute, bailii.org  (British, Irish & European Union case law)

 

H:   Couse Outline

  • Historical introduction to the law of sales
  • Law merchant and the sale of goods
  • Codification of the law relating to sale of goods in the 1893 UK sale of Goods Act
  • Sale of Goods Act and its introduction in Uganda
  • Interpretation of the Sale of Goods Act

 

  • The Contract of Sale of goods (Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Sale of Goods Act)

[Weeks 1- 2]

  • Definition of a contract of sales
  • Distinction between a contract of sale and other commercial contracts (barter/ exchange, gifts, bailment, hire-purchase, finance leasing, supply of services, loan on security for goods, agency etc).
  • Formalities and formation of a contract of sales;
  • Subject matter of a contract of sale;
  • Price in a contract of sales;

 

 

Cases:

  • Aldridge v Johnson (1851-58) 8 QB 118
  • Robinson v Graves (1935) 1KB 579.
  • Adam v Tanga – Mombasa Transport Co. (1955) 28 KLR 14.
  • Choitram v Lazar (1945) EA 157.
  • Dennant v Skinner (1948) 2 KB 164
  • Cammell Laird & Co. Ltd v Manganese Bronze & Brass Co. Ltd (1943) AC 402
  • Ghulam Kadir v British Overseas Engineering Corporation (E.A.) Ltd., (1957) EA 131
  • Helby v Mathews & Ors (1895) AC 471
  • Jiwa Singh v Rugnth Jerum (1945) EACA 21
  • John Nsaga v Haji Juma Kayongo c/o 607/1978 High Court of Uganda
  • Kanti Printing Works v Tanga District Administration (1970) HCB 257
  • Karia v Shah (1962) EA 43
  • Leslie & Anderson v Kassam Jivraj & Co. Ltd (1950) EACA 84
  • Maloo Manji v. Rev (1930 I Tan L.R. (R) 163
  • Matayo Musoke v Alibhai Garage Ltd. (1960) EA 31.
  • National Pharmacy Ltd. V Kampala City Council C/S 461/1977 Uganda High Court
  • Sivjani v Kenya Garage (1952) 26 KLR 25.
  • Suleman Virji Kassam Amosi 9 EALR 33
  • Sultani v J.B. Morgan (1960) EA 434

 

  • Transfer of Property and Title Under the Contract of sale

[Weeks 3-5]

 

  • Transfer of Title: Sec. 22-26:

The principle of Nemo dat quad non habet (one cannot pass a better title than that possessed)

  • Badilsche Anilin v Basle Chemical (1898) AC 200
  • Bishopsgate Motor Fianance Corp v Transport Brakes Ltd [1949] 1 KB 332
  • Butterwood v Kingsway Motors (1954) 1 WLR 1286
  • Dennant v Skinner (1948) 2 KB 162
  • Ingram v Little (1961) 1 QB 31
  • Johana Mbugwa v Mwangi Mugwe (1949)16 EACA 1
  • Karimbux v Dalgety (1934) 1 EACA 121
  • Kirkham v Attenborough (1897) 1 QB 201
  • Kursell v Timber Operator (1927) 1 KB. 298. C.A.
  • Re Wait (1927) 1 Ch. 606
  • Tarling v Baxter (1827) 6 QB 31
  • Underwood v Burgh Castle Brick & Cement Syndicate (1922) 1 KB 343,
  • Varley v Whipp (1900) 1 QB 31
  • Vithaldas Haridas & Co v Valki & Co., HCCS 34/1927
  • Weiner v Gill (1906) 2 KB 574
  • Weiner v Harris (1910) 1 KB 285
  • Atari Corporation v Electronics Boutique Stores [1998] 1 ALL ER 1010
  • Laury v John [1926] 1 KB 223
  • National coal board v Gamble [1959] 1 QB 11
  • Healy v Howlett & Sons [1917] 1 KB 337
  • Laurie & Anor. V John Dudin & Anor [1926] 1KB 223
  • Re an arbitration btn Shipton Anderson & Co. Ltd and Harrison Bros. & Co. Ltd [1915] 3 KB 676
  • Pignataro v Gilroy & Sons [1919] 1 KB 459
  • Nanka Bruce v Common wealth Trust Ltd [1926] AC 77

 

  • Transfer of Title by Non – Owner / Exceptions to Nemo Dat (Sections 22-26 SGA)
  • Eastern Distributors v Goldring (1957) 1QB 371
  • Central Newbury Car Auctions v Unity Finance (1957) 1 QB 371
  • Vallabhdas Hirji Kapadia v Laxmidas (1964) EA 378
  • Lloyds and Scottish Finance v Williamson (1965) 1 ALL ER 641
  • Pacific Motor Auctions v Motor Credits (1965) ALL ER 105
  • Dennant v Skinner (1948) 2 KB 164

 

  • Exceptions to Nemo Dat
  • Estoppel by representation & Negligence

Henderson & Co. Ltd v Williams (1895) 1QB 521

Farquharson Bros v J King & Co. Ltd (1902) AC 325

  • Sale by agent
  • Sale under special powers of sale
  • Sale Under Voidable Title

Phillips v Brooks (1919) 2 KB 243

Cundy v Lindsay (1878) 3 AC 459

Ingram v Little (1961) 1 QB 31

Lewis v Avery (1971) 2 ALL ER 507

Namjee Brothers v Awadh (1969) EA 521

  • Sale by Seller in Possession.

Staff Motor Guarantee Ltd v British Wagon (1934) ALL ER 322

Union Transport Finance Ltd. V Ballardie (1965) ALL ER 105

Worcester Finance Co. v Cooden Engineering Co. Lt. (1971) 3 WLR 661 / [1972] 1QB 210

Eastern Distributors Ltd. v Goldring (1957) 2 QB 600

Olds Discount, Ltd. v Krett (1940) 2 KB 117

Cundy v Lindsay (1878) 3 AC 459

Weingut v Leslie [1967] EA 480

 

  • Sale by Buyer in Possession

Worcester Financing C.V Cooden Engineering (1971) WLR 661

Lee v Butler (1893) 2 QB 318

Helby v Mathews (1895) 2 QB 318

Matayo Musoke v Allibhai Garage (Supra)

Pacific Motor Auction v Motor Credits  (Hire Finance) Ltd (1965) AC 867

Mubarak Ali v Wali Mohamed (1938) 18 KLR 23

Kressaman v Lakhani (1964) EA 249

Newtons of Wembley v Williams (1964) 3 ALL ER 532, C.A

 

  • Sale by mercantile Agent in possession of goods with owner’s consent

Moody v Pall Mall Deposit (1917) 3 TLR 306

Rolkes v King (1923) 1 KB 282

Lloyds Bank v Bank of America (1938) 2 KB 147

 

  • Ordinary course of business

Pearson v Rose Young (1951) 1 KD 275

Stadium Finance Ltd. v Robbins (1962) 2 QB 664

Oppenheimer v Prazar & Wyatt (1907) 2 KB 519

 

  • Risk and Frustration (Sections. 21,33,7 & 8 [week 6]
  • Bolus & Co v Kirparam & Some (1915) 6 EALR
  • Elphich v Barnes (188) 5 C.P.D. 321
  • Sterns Ltd v Vickers Ltd (1923) 1 KB 78
  • Demby Hamilton v Bearden (1949) 1 ALL ER 435
  • Tarling v Baxter (1823) 6 lB.C. 360
  • Asfar & Co. Ltd V Blundell (1896) 1 QB 123, CA
  • Horn v Minister of Food (1948) 2 ALL ER 1036
  • Barrow, Lane & Ballard Ltd v Phillip Phillips & Co. Ltd (1929) 1 KB 574
  • McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377 (Aust)
  • Tsakirogolou v Noblee Thori (1961) 2 WLR 633/(1962) AC 93
  • Twentsche Overseas Trading v Uganda Sugar 12 EACA1
  • Financing Ltd. Stinson (1962) 3 ALL ER 386
  • Howell v Coupland (1876) 1 QB 258

 

  • Performance of the contract [week 7-8]
  • Kampala General Agency Ltd v Moody’s (EA) Ltd (1963) EA 549
  • Hussein Bachoov Clove Growers Ass. Of Zanzibar (1957) EA 193
  • Doola Singh & Sons v Uganda Foundary & MW (1957) 12 EA 193
  • Mohamedraza Rashid Nathani v Layland 8 ZLR 20
  • Harling v Eddy (1951) 2 KB 739
  • Oscar Chess Ltd. v Williams (1957) 1 WLR 370
  • Routledge v Mackay (1954) 1 WLR 615
  • DeLessalle v Guidford 1901 2 KB 215

 

  • Implied Duties of the seller
  • The duty to pass a good title

 

  • Sellers right to sell the goods
    • All Kassan Virani v United Africa Co. (1958) EA 204
    • Llanga v Manyoka 91961 EA 705
    • Lakhamani Bros. Ltd. v Raja & Sons (1966) EA 178
    • Rowland v Dival (1923) 2 KB 500, CA
    • Butterworth v Kingsway Motors (1954) 1 WLR (1986)
    • Niblett v Confectioners Material (1921) 3KB 387/ CA

 

  • Warranty of Quiet Possession
  • Lakhamani Bros. v Raja & Sons (1966) EA 178
  • Ali Kassam Virani Ltd. v United African Co. (1958) EA 204
  • Mason v Birmingham (1949) 2 KB 545.

 

  • Warranty that Goods are Free from Encumbrances
  • W. Bank v Poynter (1895) AC 56
  • Official Assignees of Madres v Mercantile Bank of India (1938) AC 287

 

  • The duty to deliver the goods, and at the right time, and in the right quantity
  • Duty to supply goods of the right quality

    

     Basic Rule:  Caveat Emptor

 

  • Implied Condition that Goods shall correspond with Description
  • Abdul Salem v East African Trading Co. 2 EALR 12
  • Livio Carli v Salem (s Mohamed (1959) EA 701
  • Alibhai Panju & Sons Ltd v Sunderji 16 EACA 72
  • Pan African Trading Agencies v Chande Bros 19 EACA 141
  • Juthalal Velji v Gulamjusen R Jirraji 16 EACA 75
  • Nurmohamed Murji Dattu EACA 294
  • Varley v Whipp (1900) 1 QB 513
  • Re Moore & Landaner (1921) 2 KB 519, CA
  • Christopher Hill v Fur Farm supplies (1968) 1 Llyod Rep. 457

 

  • Implied condition that goods must be fit for particular purpose
  • Norman v Overseas Motor Transport Ltd. (1959) EA 131
  • Omer v Besse (1960) EA 907
  • Dola Singh v Uganda F & M Works 12 EACA 33
  • Mozecedraza R. Mathani v Layllani 8 ZLR 3 20
  • Ashington Paggeries v Christopher Hill Ltd. (1972) AC 441
  • Baldry v Marshall (1925) 1KB 260
  • Spencer v Devon (1947) 1 ALL ER 284
  • Cammel Laird & C. Ltd. v Manganese Bronze & Brass Co. Ltd (1934) AC 402

 

  • Implied Condition that goods are Merchantable
  • Omer v Besse 2(1960) EA 907
  • Doola Singh v Uganda Foundry & Machinery 12 EACA 33
  • Bristol Tramways Co Ltd v Fiat Motors Ltd [1910] 2 KB 831
  • Wren v Holt (1903) 1 K.B. 668
  • Wilson v Richet Cooherell (1954) 1 QB 598
  • Geddling v Marsh (1929) 1 KB 668
  • Nibelett v Confectioners Materials Co. Ltd (1921) 3 KB 387
  • Taylor v Combined Buyers (1924) NZLR 627 at 645

 

  • Terms implied by trade usage

Flency V King Mohammed Walli & Co. 1ZLR 17

  • Terms implied in sales by sample
  • Jafferali Abdul, v Jan Mohammed Ltd., 18 EACA 21
  • Shaha Rhambhai Patel 23 EACA 329
  • Ali Kassam Virani Ltd Janmohamed Ltd 18 EACA 21
  • Godley v Perry (1960) 1 ALL ER 254

 

  • Exemption Clauses [week 9]
  • Omer v Basses 9 (1960) EA 907
  • Jafferali Abdul v Janmohamed Ltd (1957) 18 EACA 21
  • Wallis v. Pratt (1911) AC 394
  • Baldry v Marshall (1925) 1KB 260, CA
  • Andrews v Singer (1934) 1KB 170, CA
  • L’ Estrange v Graucob (1934) 2 KB 394
  • Karsales v Wallis (1956) 1 WLR 936/ (1956) 2 ALL ER 866
  • Suisse Atlantique v Rotterdamsche (1966) 2 All E.R. 61/ (1967) 1 AC 361
  • Photo Productions Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd (1980) AC 827
  • Curtis V. Chemical Cleaning Cleaning Co. [1951] 1 ALL ER 631
  • Dar Es Salaam Motor Transport Co. Ltd V. Metha & Others [1952] 2 EACA 447
  • Spurling Ltd V. Bradshaw [1956] 2 ALL ER 121

 

  • The Duties of the Buyer [week 10]
  • The Duty to Pay the Price
  • D Kresman & Co. v Ltd. Lakhani Ltd. (1964) EA 294
  • Kari Singh v General workshops 18 EACA 4
  • National Pharmacy Ltd. v Kampala City Council Ltd (1977)

 

  • The Duty to Take Delivery
  • Kampala General Agency Ltd v Mody’s (EA) Ltd (Supra)
  • Alinius v Globe Merchantile Corpn. Ltd (1968) EA 114
  • Devshi S. Shah v Sudhnan Mohanlal (1951) EACA 79

 

  • Privity of Contract [week 11]
  • Shanklin Pier Ltd v Detel Products Ltd (1951) 2 KB 854
  • Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball (1893) 1 QB 258
  • Rose Standardized Disinfectant Co. (1968) 2 EACA 125

 

  • Remedies [weeks 11-12]

 

  • Remedies of the Seller

 

  • Jus In Rem (real remedies): Unpaid seller’s Rights and Powers against the goods

     Omer v Besse (1960) E.A 907

 

  • Unpaid Seller’s Lien
  • Guster Adolf v Leslie (1967) EA
  • Mohamed Hussein v Kashayji etc (1952) 19 EACA 162
  • Housing & Co., v Barshi TZLR 272

 

  • Unpaid Seller’s Right of Stoppage in Transitu
  • Bethel Q. Co. v Clerk & Co. (1988) 20 QB 615
  • Lyons v Hoffnung (1890) 15 AC 391
  • Housing & Co v Dharsi TZLR 272
  • Mordaunt Bros v British Oil & Cake Mills Ltd (1910) 2 KB 502

 

  • Unpaid Seller’s Right of Resale
  • Bhangwanji & Co. v Mohamed (1953) 26 KLR 12
  • Housing & Co. Saleh Dharsi 1SZLR 272
  • Callagher v Shillick (1949) 2 KB 765

 

  • Jus In Personum (Personal remedies): remedies against the buyer himself
    • Action for the Price
  • Ghulam Kadir v British Overseas Engineering Corp. (1957) EA 131
  • Devshi Samat Shah v Burhram M (1951) EACA 79
  • Hari Singh v General Workshop (1951) 18 EACA 4
  • Guggehhem Ltd v Ratguru (1952) 7 ULR 55

 

  • Action for damages for non- acceptance of the goods
  • Davshi Samat Shah v B. Mohamlal 18 EACA 79
  • Kassam Jivrj & Co. Ltd. Gullamhussein & Co. 24 (2) KLR 40

 

  • Remedies of the Buyer
  • Rejection of the Goods.
  • Copalds Chagan Siraj v Like Thomas 7 Co. LTD (1961) EA 29
  • Livio Carli v Salen Homahed Boshanfer (1959) EA 701
  • Jiwan Singh v Rugnath Jeram (145) 12 EACA 21
  • Pan African Trading Agency v Chande Bros Ltd (1951) 19 EACA
  • Mussa Hassan v Hunt (1964) EA 201
  • Livin Carli v Geom R zompichaita (1961) EA 100
  • Kampala General Agency v Mody’s (1963) EA 549
  • Panaser v Popat (1968) EA 17

 

  • Loss of Right to reject goods
  • The iron and Steel Work v Martyr 7 ULR 146
  • Norman v Overseas Transport 91959) EA 131
  • V. African Handlers Ass v Kanji (1923) 9 KLR 196
  • Uttamchard & Co. Ltd v F.J. Hawkes & Co. Ltd 91955) EA 197
  • Murji v A.C.D. (1955) 22 EACA 294
  • Kishen v Leyland 5 EAPLR 159
  • Hardy & Cp. V. Hillems (1923) 2 KB 490
  • Rosenthal & Sons Ltd v Esmail (1965) 2 ALL ER 860
  • Popular Hardware’s Ltd v Electro Craft Ltd HCCS 5210/1976

 

  • Action for non- delivery

 

  • Specific performance

       Isaac Bishari v Vitafoam [1994] VI KALR 180

Uganda Christian University Bachelor of Laws Courses For Year 1

LLB 1

Contracts I

Introducing Law

Criminal Law

Constitutional History

Uganda Christian University Bachelor of Laws Courses For Year 2

LLB 2

Foundations of Land Law

Nature and History of Torts

Administrative Processes

Legal Methods

Law of Sales

Uganda Christian University Bachelor of Laws Courses For Year 3


LLB 3

Jurisprudence II

Business Associations I

Evidence I

Criminal Procedure

International Law 1

Family Law

Uganda Christian University Bachelor of Laws Courses For Year 4


LLB 4

Civil Procedure I

Clinical Legal Education I

Intellectual Property I

International Humanitarian Law

Oil & Gas  Law

Labour Law 1

Alternative Dispute Resolution

ICT Law and Policy

Environmental Law and Policy

Gender & the Law

[button link=”https://ugfacts.net/list-law-schools-uganda/” bg_color=”red”]List of Law Schools in Uganda[/button]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sponsored Links